ROOF Blog

90% of couples under 40 with children in London can’t afford to get on the housing ladder. Analysis by the National Housing and Planning Advice Unit found that as an average figure across the capital only 10% of young families could afford to buy a suitable home. The figure drops to 5% in some areas including Camden, Hammersmith and Islington. Only in the wealthier boroughs of Richmond, Redbridge, Merton and Bromley can more than 20% of young families afford to buy a home. The figure of 10% in London compares with 21.4% in the South West and 23.8% for the South East.

Nearly one in ten over-70s are still paying to support their children, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said yesterday. Hundreds of thousands of elderly people are bearing the financial burden of a family despite having had to retire in their sixties. The findings reflect the rising ‘boomerang generation’ of twentysomethings returning to the family home to rely on their parents after leaving university, as well as the increasing age at which many couples are having children. On top of this, a quarter of grandparents are paying towards the upbringing of their children’s children, other figures have shown.

Shocking new research released by Shelter shows that people are being forced to delay having children because of the lack of affordable housing. The research reveals that 18 per cent of 18–44 year olds, equivalent to 2.4 million people nationwide, are actively putting off having children because of high housing costs. This rises to 24 per cent among 18-34 year olds. The figures come from a survey commissioned by Shelter to discover the impact of the lack of affordable housing across all areas of people’s lives. In particular, the research examines the impact on relationships and family life.

Frontline services such as social work, meals on wheels and road maintenance may have to be cut to cover the cost of controversial plans for elderly care at home, local authority leaders have warned. The £670 million required to provide free care for those most in need in their own homes — a key government policy — will add pressure to councils already trying to find multimillion-pound savings. A rise in council tax of between 1 and 2 per cent will be needed to meet the cost, while cuts in adult and childrens’ social care services are an ‘unwanted but very real possibility’, council chiefs have said. The draft Bill, set out in the Queen’s Speech in November, was described by Labour peers as an ‘exocet’ on social-care reform and ‘a demolition job’ on budgets, while MPs and care providers have also criticised it for being ill-conceived and uncosted.

Research from the Office for National Statistics shows that almost one in five graduates in their late twenties now live with their parents.

By contrast, only one in eight university graduates had failed to fly the nest by the same age 20 years ago.

Rising property prices, mounting student debts and the effects of recession on the job market have forced a wave of young people to move back into the family home at an age when they would normally be moving out.

The research suggests that young people in Britain are twice as likely to live with their parents in their late twenties than their counterparts elsewhere in Europe.

A ground-breaking website that exposes the quality of public services – from children’s welfare to council recycling, and crime fighting to teaching – goes live today.

Oneplace, an ambitious collaboration involving six independent inspectorates, is intended to provide a consumer guide to the performance of local authorities, police forces, schools, NHS primary care trusts, prisons and probation services.

The website draws together assessments by the Audit Commission, Ofsted, the Care Quality Commission, and the inspectorates of constabulary, probation and prisons.

Reports on the overall performance of councils in England, and ratings for children’s services, are also revealed, highlighting the best and worst.

London Mayor Boris Johnson has urged MPs to show children living in overcrowded homes the same concern as they have shown battery chickens.

More than 270 MPs have signed a parliamentary motion calling for better living conditions for chickens.

The mayor and Shelter are calling on the government to rewrite definitions of overcrowding, which they say was promised in 2004. About 330,000 children in London live in overcrowded homes, Shelter says.

Current legislation passed in 1935 means a family of four living in a one-bedroom flat are not classed as being in overcrowded accommodation.

Shelter’s director of policy and campaigns, Kay Boycott, said the number of children living in overcrowded homes has gone up 10 per cent in two years. ‘People cannot afford to move to larger homes when they have children,’ she said.

‘The legal standard for accommodation needs to be rewritten by government. Living in confined conditions has a devastating effect on family life, especially children’s safety, health and education,’ she added.

An independent report has found that a government programme providing housing support to vulnerable and homeless people has resulted in ‘significant’ savings in the cost of other services. The report said the £1.6 billion invested through Supporting People has saved other services more than £3.4 billion through reduced costs in homelessness, tenancy failure, crime, health and residential care. It has also lead to other benefits including reducing the risk of social exclusion, increasing educational chances for children and improving the quality of life for vulnerable people.

The rising cost of fuel, food and public transport has hit the poor hardest. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation calculates that the cost of living for those on a minimum household budget is rising faster than inflation. The costs for a single household on a low-income budget were up 5.3 per cent this year, followed by 5 per cent up for pensioners and couples with children.

The House of Lords upheld a Court of Appeal decision that a local authority’s children’s service unit had not fulfilled its duty of care to a homeless child, just by referring him to a homeless person’s unit. The claimant had presented himself to Southwark council’s children’s services department asking for urgent assessment under section 17 of the Children Act 1989 and immediate accommodation under section 20(1). The assessment initially concluded that, as he was 17 and not in fulltime education, accommodation provided by the homeless person’s unit was sufficient.