ROOF Blog

Thousands of council tenants who make profits by illegally subletting their homes will face tough new measures to be announced by ministers this week. Subletting fraud is a civil offence punishable by a modest fine and the loss of tenancy. But John Housing Minister John Healey intends to make it a criminal offence so that the courts can recover the profits made. Those convicted could also face larger fines and prison sentences. Mr Healey estimates that up to 200,000 council tenants nationwide are illegally subletting their homes with many fraudulently claiming housing benefit at the same time, costing taxpayers tens of millions of pounds. He said that uncovering illegal subletting could free up at least 20,000 council homes if 10% of unlawful tenants were removed.

Young people trying to get on the property ladder were handed a pre-election boost worth up to £2,500 after the chancellor scrapped stamp duty on homes costing £250,000 or less for first-time buyers. The move will be funded by an increase to 5% in the duty on homes costing £1m or more, which will see buyers of these properties having to hand over a minimum of £50,000 in tax. The move was quickly dubbed by some as a ‘Robin Hood’ tax on the rich. The new £250,000 threshold, which took effect at midnight last night and will last for two years, means nine out of 10 people buying their first home will not be liable for the tax.

Hundreds of out-of-work families who have been living in expensive homes at the taxpayers’ expense are facing eviction after changes to housing benefit announced yesterday. Alistair Darling said that from October next year the most expensive properties would be removed from the housing benefit calculation. Housing benefit, which can be as much as £1,800 a week, discouraged people from working and was unfair on those who accepted smaller, cheaper homes, he said. Housing benefit will be capped at £1,100 a week, meaning that 13,000 families, mostly in London, will have to move out of their current properties and into somewhere more modest.

Buying a home has become a pipe dream for millions of young Britons – with half believing they will have to wait up to a decade or more before getting a foot on the property ladder, and only then with the help of their parents, according to a new poll. The YouGov survey, commissioned by the National Housing Federation, revealed that 86% of 18-30 year-olds could not currently afford to buy a home if they wanted to, despite recent falls in house prices. Federation chief executive David Orr said: ‘The three main parties must commit to building significant numbers of affordable homes for rent and sale to avoid locking an entire generation out of having their own home. The next government must view housing in the same terms as health, education and policing – and protect it from budget cuts, given the scale of the crisis’.

90% of couples under 40 with children in London can’t afford to get on the housing ladder. Analysis by the National Housing and Planning Advice Unit found that as an average figure across the capital only 10% of young families could afford to buy a suitable home. The figure drops to 5% in some areas including Camden, Hammersmith and Islington. Only in the wealthier boroughs of Richmond, Redbridge, Merton and Bromley can more than 20% of young families afford to buy a home. The figure of 10% in London compares with 21.4% in the South West and 23.8% for the South East.

The Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) has announced that Saxon Weald and Eastbourne borough council have been successful in a bid for almost £6.2 million grant funding to develop an extra care scheme in Langney. Derry Court and the land adjacent to it, owned by East Sussex county council, will be developed together to achieve the purpose built scheme.  The development is forecast to provide 62 high-quality self-contained apartments for older people who have an assessed care need and require support with daily living.

Fifty years ago, the average home cost £2,507 and one in seven had the loo outside. A half century on, the average home costs £162,085 but spare a thought for the two in every 1,000 households that still rely on an outside loo, according to research published by Halifax. The decade-by-decade data paints a picture of Britain today more divided than ever by regional house price differences. Halifax found that the region with the lowest prices in 1960 – Yorkshire and Humberside – remains the lowest, but said that every region in Britain has fallen further and further behind London. It said the difference was down to the rise in real earnings, which have increased more in Greater London than in any other region. However, incomes have failed to keep pace with rampant property prices everywhere. Halifax found that prices rose by 273 per cent in real terms between 1959 and 2009. Over the same period, the growth in real earnings was 169 per cent.

Housing and planning minister John Healey has published research claiming that inappropriate building on back gardens is not a widespread, national problem and is often linked to councils’ failure to have local policies in place. He told the small minority of councils who reported issues in ‘hot spot’ areas that the power to act is already in their own hands if they establish clear, local policies. The intensive, countrywide review by Kingston University was commissioned last year to assess the nature and extent of the issue across the country and how it could be tackled. Garden grabbing can affect the character of an area if very different properties are built alongside family homes. The research concluded that although the issue is not a widespread national problem, a minority of councils in London, the South East and West Midlands had reported an impact in their areas.

Grant Shapps, the shadow housing minister, says a Conservative government would promote home ownership – without returning to Thatcher-era council house sell-offs. Labour, he claims, is sidelining home ownership and re-emphasising the importance of social housing. ‘Labour has given up on aspiration in their rush to shore up their core voting areas,’ he says. ‘I couldn’t disagree more with them.’

Almost 8000 homes for Armed Forces families are standing empty despite the Ministry of Defence spending £17m a year renting substitute properties. Figures showed there are currently 7889 unoccupied homes for service families in the UK, including 2077 that have been empty for more than a year. But the MoD has spent more than £88m since 2004 on renting homes where no suitable properties are available, with the bill for 2009 topping £17m. Liberal Democrat defence spokesman, Willie Rennie, who uncovered the figures, said: ‘It is scandalous that the Government is spending millions renting forces homes despite already having thousands of houses standing empty.’